Since the very beginning, the European Court of Justice (now Court of Justice of the European Union) has been called to decide on the compatibility of national legislation regulating the exercise of employed and self-employed activities with Treaty provisions on the free movement of workers. As is well known, the position of the Court has always been generous in terms of defining the personal scope of application of those provisions and has adopted a broad notion of ‘worker’ and ‘mobility’. This essay aims to analyse some recent developments of the case law of the Court in relation to both notions to highlight the pros and cons of such position.

‘Worker’ (and) ‘Mobility’ in the Case Law of the Court of Justice EU on Free Movement: A Critical Appraisal

edoardo ales
2020-01-01

Abstract

Since the very beginning, the European Court of Justice (now Court of Justice of the European Union) has been called to decide on the compatibility of national legislation regulating the exercise of employed and self-employed activities with Treaty provisions on the free movement of workers. As is well known, the position of the Court has always been generous in terms of defining the personal scope of application of those provisions and has adopted a broad notion of ‘worker’ and ‘mobility’. This essay aims to analyse some recent developments of the case law of the Court in relation to both notions to highlight the pros and cons of such position.
2020
978-3-7255-8103-0
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11367/99996
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact