In August 2019 South Africa withdrew its signature from the Protocol on SADC Tribunal signed in 2014 by 9 SADC Member States. This decision was adopted in compliance with the judgment of the South African High Court as confirmed by the Constitutional Court which ruled that the participation of the President in the decision to suspend the SADC Tribunal, as well as his signature of the 2014 Protocol were unconstitutional, unlawful and irrational. These rulings are particularly ground-breaking in light of the conclusions they reached and raised some interesting implications under international law.

Liberty of Entering in International Agreements and Compliance of International Obligations. Some Remarks Alongside the South African Courts’ Judgments on the SADC Tribunal

Tino E
2021-01-01

Abstract

In August 2019 South Africa withdrew its signature from the Protocol on SADC Tribunal signed in 2014 by 9 SADC Member States. This decision was adopted in compliance with the judgment of the South African High Court as confirmed by the Constitutional Court which ruled that the participation of the President in the decision to suspend the SADC Tribunal, as well as his signature of the 2014 Protocol were unconstitutional, unlawful and irrational. These rulings are particularly ground-breaking in light of the conclusions they reached and raised some interesting implications under international law.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11367/95290
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact