The law no. 136 of 13th August 2010, entitled “Extraordinary plan against Maias”, has introduced the “revocazione” of the prevention seizure, thus illing a legal vacuum, as already emphasized by the literature, which expressed the need to remedy a miscarriage of justice of inal judgment on preventive measures. The Author, while appreciating the introduction of this new extraordinary means of appeal, highlights its limits, its implemention problems as well as the differences compared to the revision of the convinction sentence pursuant to art. 630 Code of criminal procedure, the same model which inspired the legislator in 2010.

La “revocazione” della confisca di prevenzione: un quadro di sintesi

2013

Abstract

The law no. 136 of 13th August 2010, entitled “Extraordinary plan against Maias”, has introduced the “revocazione” of the prevention seizure, thus illing a legal vacuum, as already emphasized by the literature, which expressed the need to remedy a miscarriage of justice of inal judgment on preventive measures. The Author, while appreciating the introduction of this new extraordinary means of appeal, highlights its limits, its implemention problems as well as the differences compared to the revision of the convinction sentence pursuant to art. 630 Code of criminal procedure, the same model which inspired the legislator in 2010.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11367/21160
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact