Selecting suppliers for circular supply chains is an important requirement, demanding evaluation frameworks that capture reuse, reverse flows, and waste minimization beyond traditional metrics. This paper introduces a structured model designed to assess suppliers against specific circularity-oriented criteria. The Best-Worst Method (BWM) derives criteria weights, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) ratings evaluate alternatives, and a risk assessment stage consolidates the final ranking. The primary insights of this research include: (i) the development of a structured supplier evaluation model that encompasses dimensions like closed-loop integration, end-of-life management, material efficiency, and waste management into a multi-criteria perspective; (ii) applying BWM to derive consistent criteria weights, clarifying how circular performance attributes shape supplier prioritization; (iii) applying AHP ratings and risk assessment to consolidate the evaluation into a final ranking of alternatives; and (iv) demonstrating the operational feasibility and applicability of the framework through a real-world case analysis, providing empirical evidence for assessing circular supplier performance in industrial environments.
Supplier Selection Framework in Circular Supply Chains: Combining BWM, AHP Ratings, and Risk Analysis
Petrillo A.;
2026-01-01
Abstract
Selecting suppliers for circular supply chains is an important requirement, demanding evaluation frameworks that capture reuse, reverse flows, and waste minimization beyond traditional metrics. This paper introduces a structured model designed to assess suppliers against specific circularity-oriented criteria. The Best-Worst Method (BWM) derives criteria weights, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) ratings evaluate alternatives, and a risk assessment stage consolidates the final ranking. The primary insights of this research include: (i) the development of a structured supplier evaluation model that encompasses dimensions like closed-loop integration, end-of-life management, material efficiency, and waste management into a multi-criteria perspective; (ii) applying BWM to derive consistent criteria weights, clarifying how circular performance attributes shape supplier prioritization; (iii) applying AHP ratings and risk assessment to consolidate the evaluation into a final ranking of alternatives; and (iv) demonstrating the operational feasibility and applicability of the framework through a real-world case analysis, providing empirical evidence for assessing circular supplier performance in industrial environments.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


