In universities where the language of instruction is not (mainly) English (EN), academic members of staff from different disciplines are exposed to EN to varying extents and may thus be expected to demonstrate different degrees of EN competence. We hypothesise that, generally speaking, university professors and lecturers of national literature, national language, linguistics and local social studies may be the least obliged to use EN, while those in, or dealing with, the hard sciences have a greater need and obligation to engage with technical EN. In December 2023, a survey based on self-reporting was organised amongst the academic, administrative and student community of the nine universities that now constitute the ‘European University’ Alliance: the ‘European University of the Seas’ (SEA-EU). Amongst various other themes, this survey explored the self-declared English Language competences of lecturers and professors of sociology (N = 23) as well as lecturers and professors of chemistry (N = 88) in eight out of these universities. The results, while only indicative, support the claim that academics in the field of sociology, working in largely nonEN teaching universities, may not need a strong level of EN competence as much as chemistry lecturers and professors. Thus, one can argue that chemistry academics are generally under greater pressure to improve their level of English in all areas of language reception and production (reading, writing, listening, speaking alone or in a conversation, delivering formal lectures, preparing notes, slides and examinations, etc.) than sociology academics. These results provide valuable nuance to the use of the English language in the European academic community.

Differential exposure to the English Language? Assessing English language use among chemistry and sociology academics in European Universities

L. Abbamonte;
2024-01-01

Abstract

In universities where the language of instruction is not (mainly) English (EN), academic members of staff from different disciplines are exposed to EN to varying extents and may thus be expected to demonstrate different degrees of EN competence. We hypothesise that, generally speaking, university professors and lecturers of national literature, national language, linguistics and local social studies may be the least obliged to use EN, while those in, or dealing with, the hard sciences have a greater need and obligation to engage with technical EN. In December 2023, a survey based on self-reporting was organised amongst the academic, administrative and student community of the nine universities that now constitute the ‘European University’ Alliance: the ‘European University of the Seas’ (SEA-EU). Amongst various other themes, this survey explored the self-declared English Language competences of lecturers and professors of sociology (N = 23) as well as lecturers and professors of chemistry (N = 88) in eight out of these universities. The results, while only indicative, support the claim that academics in the field of sociology, working in largely nonEN teaching universities, may not need a strong level of EN competence as much as chemistry lecturers and professors. Thus, one can argue that chemistry academics are generally under greater pressure to improve their level of English in all areas of language reception and production (reading, writing, listening, speaking alone or in a conversation, delivering formal lectures, preparing notes, slides and examinations, etc.) than sociology academics. These results provide valuable nuance to the use of the English language in the European academic community.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11367/144078
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact